Annual Report 2022

Aerial view of a plant with green overlay (graphic)

Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Covestro regards adherence to sustainability standards within the supply chain as a fundamental factor in value creation and an important lever for minimizing risks. Both current and new Covestro suppliers must meet not only economic standards but also social, ethical, and environmental standards as well as those related to corporate responsibility. Our expectations are defined in Covestro’s Supplier Code of Conduct, the basis for our collaboration with suppliers; the Code is available online in 13 languages. The Code is derived from the principles of the UN Global Compact and our Corporate Commitment on human rights. It is integrated into the electronic ordering systems and contracts across the Covestro Group. New and renewed supply agreements in particular generally contain special clauses requesting that suppliers adhere to the sustainability requirements outlined in the Code of Conduct and entitling Covestro to verify compliance. Working conditions and health effects on people working in the supply chain are particularly important to us, which is why they are a key topic of our cross-functional Human Rights Task Force. Although the risk analysis conducted there as part of human rights due diligence focuses on direct suppliers, it also considers the upstream supply chain, especially if there are specific allegations. Conflict minerals are one area relevant to human rights that we prioritize. They include, e.g., tin, tungsten, tantalum, and gold (3TG) from conflict or high-risk regions. Conflict minerals can enter our company’s products through the upstream supply chain. To minimize the risk of including conflict minerals in our production processes, our requirements in this regard are communicated in our Supplier Code of Conduct.

Covestro has set ambitious measurable targets through 2025 aimed at systematically promoting sustainability in supplier management. All suppliers must comply with our code of conduct, which they commit to by accepting the conditions of our purchase orders or contracts. In addition, relevant suppliers with a regular purchasing value exceeding €1 million per year are assessed. In the year under review, 90% (previous year: 93%) of our total purchasing value was attributable to these target-relevant suppliers. They comply with Covestro’s sustainability requirements by meeting the minimum result as defined by us in the supplier evaluations described below. In addition, we work closely with our strategically most important suppliers to improve their sustainability performance. We have also incorporated this approach into our sustainability goals. In the reporting year, we added a risk-based approach to our goals. A risk analysis considers all suppliers, irrespective of purchasing value, on the basis of industry and country risks. Additional measures can be taken for any high-risk suppliers identified.

Evaluation Methods and Processes of the Together for Sustainability (TfS) Initiative

Covestro is a member of Together for Sustainability AISBL, Brussels (Belgium), a joint initiative undertaken by the chemical industry that now includes 40 companies. This industry-led initiative pursues the goal of establishing a program of global standards for responsibly sourcing goods and services and standardizing supplier evaluation methods worldwide. Covestro supports all criteria by the TfS initiative concerning the areas of ethics, labor & human rights, health and safety, and the environment.

As a member of TfS, Covestro is responsible for monitoring and auditing the sustainability performance of its suppliers. TfS supports this effort by providing the infrastructure for online assessments and on-site audits of suppliers by third parties. The results of these supplier evaluations can be shared via an online platform. During the reporting year, Covestro once again played an active role in all TfS work streams in designing and improving the TfS program and the associated evaluation process. Since April 2022, the head of the corporate Group Procurement function has also co-chaired TfS workstream 5, which focuses on Scope 3 emissions. This working group has published a chemical-sector-specific guideline for calculating product carbon footprints. This guideline harmonizes the methods for calculating product carbon footprints and can be applied to the vast majority of chemical products, allowing companies to compare and effectively manage Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the upstream value chain. Suppliers are also encouraged to take measures to reduce their GHG emissions to make the industry more sustainable.

In order to avoid duplication of audits, increase acceptance by suppliers, and save resources, TfS and the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) have entered into a partnership aiming to work jointly on audits of logistics service providers in particular. Cefic uses the SQAS (Safety & Quality Assessment for Sustainability) system for this purpose, a standardized assessment process for European logistics service providers and chemicals distributors that covers quality, safety, environmental, Responsible Care™, and corporate social responsibility criteria. The SQAS reports prepared by Cefic are recognized by TfS as equivalent to a TfS audit report.

Using a standardized TfS assessment process, Covestro evaluates whether the suppliers maintain the required sustainability standards. A structured prioritization process is then carried out to select the suppliers to be evaluated and either an online assessment or an on-site audit initiated for these suppliers – provided that there are no current results. In prioritizing the suppliers for these evaluations, Covestro considers a combination of country and commodity risks. The risk assessment for country and material groups that we use for our risk analysis is based on recognized external sources.

EcoVadis SAS (EcoVadis), Paris (France), an established external provider accredited by TfS, conducts the online assessments. It evaluates the degree to which suppliers’ business practices are aligned with sustainability principles. The questionnaire suppliers complete for the online assessment is based on internationally recognized sustainability standards and includes 21 sustainability criteria grouped into the categories of environmental protection, labor and human rights, ethics, and sustainable procurement. The section on sustainable procurement also inquires about the extent to which the sustainability standards of upstream suppliers are considered. Certain suppliers that do not engage in wholesale trade and do not employ more than 25 people receive an abbreviated questionnaire that does not address the topic of sustainable procurement.

The questionnaire is dynamically adapted by EcoVadis depending on factors such as the industrial sector, company size, and country risk. Suppliers must document their responses to the questionnaire with corresponding supporting documents. The EcoVadis analysts assess supplier responses and supporting documents under consideration of international standards, such as the UN Global Compact, and consolidate the data into a scorecard available online that shows results by category. This scorecard information includes a detailed overview of identified strengths and areas for improvement as well as a weighted overall result for the suppliers analyzed.

External, independent auditors trained and accredited by TfS or Cefic conduct on-site audits of selected companies – and follow-up audits, if necessary, based on defined sustainability criteria. For the purpose of monitoring the quality of the audits, the initiating TfS member takes part in audits selected on a random basis and evaluates them using a standardized checklist.

Covestro analyzes and documents the online assessments and on-site audits. The number of supplier evaluations conducted and the overall results are reviewed regularly and reported to the Chief Technology Officer. In the event of noncompliance with our sustainability requirements, we work with suppliers to define specific improvement measures and corresponding targets, and Covestro constantly verifies the implementation of the required improvements.

Despite the continuing coronavirus pandemic and its effects on our suppliers, the number of supplier evaluations conducted was up from the previous year, totaling 969 in the reporting year (previous year: 807).

Key data from the sustainability evaluations of Covestro’s suppliers1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021

 

2022

Supplier evaluations conducted in the reporting year

 

807

 

969

through online assessments

 

788

 

954

through on-site audits

 

19

 

15

Total supplier evaluations conducted

 

1,690

 

1,628

through online assessments

 

1,585

 

1,544

through on-site audits

 

105

 

84

1

Online assessments (conducted by external, independent, TfS-accredited provider EcoVadis) and on-site audits (conducted by external, independent, TfS- or Cefic-accredited auditors) of Covestro’s suppliers, both initiated by Covestro and shared within the TfS initiative, are taken into account. Only assessments of our active suppliers that are no more than three years old are included.

Supplier Evaluation Results*

At the end of fiscal 2022, the number of supplier evaluations whose results met our sustainability requirements amounted to 1,236 (previous year: 1,211). Of these supplier assessments, 304 involved our target-relevant suppliers, who account for 80% (previous year: 80%) of our target-relevant purchasing value. Furthermore, 61% of our target-relevant suppliers who underwent a repeat assessment in fiscal 2022 have improved compared with their previous results.

OUR SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT GOAL

Icon of a truck (graphic)

STATUS 2022

80%

of suppliers

2021: 80%

2020: 79%

All of our suppliers with regular purchasing volumes of more than €1 million per year are expected to comply with our sustainability requirements by the year 2025.

In the year 2022, assessment results considered critical by Covestro were identified for one target-relevant supplier (previous year: seven); that is, this supplier failed to meet the required minimum result by a significant margin. Covestro responds to such infractions with specific action plans and demands that the suppliers in question implement appropriate corrective measures; supplier assessments will be conducted in future to verify compliance.

The share of online assessments in which suppliers met the minimum result we defined (45 out of 100 possible points) was 82% for the online assessments conducted in the year under review (previous year: 77%). Thanks to our joint efforts toward continually improving our sustainability performance as well as training opportunities offered, the results of the online assessments improved year over year.

Overall results of the online assessments completed in the reporting year

Overall results of the online assessments completed in the reporting year (bar chart)

The share of on-site audits in which suppliers met the minimum result we defined (45 out of 100 possible points) was 93% for the on-site audits conducted in the year under review (previous year: 100%).

None of the supplier assessments conducted revealed any indication of child or forced labor. In addition, Covestro had no cause to terminate a supplier relationship in the reporting year or in the previous year solely on account of an externally determined result or a serious sustainability deficit.

*The results provided by the external providers EcoVadis SAS, Together for Sustainability AISBL, and the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) were not subject to the audit by KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Düsseldorf (Germany).

Worldwide Supplier Evaluations through the TfS Initiative*

In the year 2022, the now 40 members of TfS evaluated the sustainability performance of a total of 8,386 suppliers through online assessments and performed 378 on-site supplier audits.

All the results from the online assessments and on-site audits are available to members of the initiative on an online platform, thereby enabling continual monitoring of suppliers with a view to improvements. The TfS initiative also benefits suppliers because their standardized evaluations can be viewed by all TfS members. This means they do not have to complete multiple evaluation surveys from various (potential) customers.

In October 2022, Covestro hosted a TfS North America Committee meeting in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (United States), which focused on issues such as corporate governance, sustainability evaluations and audits, developments in the working group, communications, and GHG emissions.

Detailed Results of the Supplier Evaluations*

We regularly analyze the results of the online assessments in the areas of environment, labor and human rights, ethics, and sustainable procurement. The results of the assessments carried out in the previous year and the reporting year are summarized in the following chart:

Detailed results of the online assessments completed in the reporting year

Detailed results of the online assessments completed in the reporting year (bar chart)

The detailed results in all areas indicate a positive trend (increased share of online assessments reaching a score of 45 or higher).

In analyzing the supplier evaluations for the year 2022, we identified deviations from our sustainability requirements in all listed areas. This was due to factors including missing documentation of policies and measures relating to waste, water, and environmental management as well as a lack of occupational safety measures such as insufficient or no signage installed at emergency exits or exceeding the weekly working hours according to the TfS standard. 

*The results provided by the external providers EcoVadis SAS, Together for Sustainability AISBL, and the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) were not subject to the audit by KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Düsseldorf (Germany).

Sustainability Training and Dialogue

For Covestro, it is important for our own procurement staff, in particular, to have a comprehensive understanding of the significance of sustainability in the supply chain. Awareness of this issue was raised among employees again in fiscal 2022 in company-wide sustainability training plus region- and country-specific training on evaluation methods and processes.

During the reporting year, we continued to promote the implementation of four strategic principles in procurement (reliability, sustainability, cost transformation, and innovation). Moreover, our regional program management in the EMLA, NA, and APAC regions is working on permanently improving our sustainability program.

Dialogue and close collaboration are essential in enabling suppliers to successfully comply with Covestro’s sustainability requirements. We therefore offer our suppliers a range of opportunities for training and dialogue. This provides the foundation for building reliable relationships and enables us to identify and eliminate issues at an early stage. Continually improving our suppliers’ sustainability performance is a priority for Covestro and is supported by the TfS initiative, which regularly organizes supplier days and promotes further training, among other activities. The TfS Academy was launched in April 2022, a platform for buyers in the chemical industry and their suppliers on which they can expand and deepen their knowledge, keep up to date with trends, and make their contribution to creating more sustainable, more innovative, and more resilient supply chains. The TfS Academy currently provides access to more than 335 courses in ten languages.

APAC
Comprises all countries in the Asia and Pacific region.
Due Diligence
Information on the processes for identifying, preventing, and mitigating the actual or possible negative impact on nonfinancial factors.
EMLA
Comprises all countries in Europe, the Middle East, Latin America (excluding Mexico), and Africa.
EcoVadis
Rating agency that evaluates the degree to which supplier business practices are aligned with sustainability principles.
NA / North America
Region comprising Canada, Mexico, and the United States.
Scope 1, Scope 2, Scope 3 Emissions
The GHG Protocol distinguishes between direct emissions of greenhouse gases (Scope 1), emissions from the generation of externally purchased energy (Scope 2), and all other emissions arising in the value chain either before or after our business activities (Scope 3).
TfS / Together for Sustainability
An initiative undertaken by various companies in the chemical industry to standardize supplier assessments globally in order to improve sustainability practices in the supply chain.
UN Global Compact
The world’s largest responsible corporate governance initiative. The member companies undertake to implement 10 universal principles and regularly document their progress.

Topics filter

What are you looking for? Filter our online annual report by main topics.

Results